Results
Of the dos,982 questionnaires/accessibility rules distributed, 497 had been entitled to the analysis. The new reaction rate was 16.7% (impulse speed of outpatient care and attention 14.6%, impulse speed away from healthcare facilities 18.1% and you can reaction speed of nursing homes sixteen.0%). Since just n = 31 nurses out-of healthcare facilities participated, they were excluded out podłączenie blackfling of study research. Immediately following research cleaning, the past number of participants was letter = 437.
Detailed efficiency
The basic services of one’s studies population are displayed during the Desk dos. An average age the fresh new nurses was 42.8 age, and you can 388 (89.6%) was indeed females. Altogether, 316 nurses answered the question how much cash working big date they spend handling palliative customers. 16 (5.1%) nurses stated using virtually no time taking care of palliative patients, 124 (39.2%) nurses advertised ranging from step one% so you can 10%, 61 (%) nurses advertised ranging from 11% to 20% and you can 115 (thirty six.4%) nurses claimed using more 20% of its operating going back to caring for palliative people. As much as you to-3rd (n = 121, 27.7%) of your own nurses inside studies did not address that it matter. A hundred seventeen (31.5%) nurses claimed cuatro or more diligent fatalities, 218 (54.9%) advertised 1 to 3 patient fatalities and you can 62 (fifteen.6%) reported 0 diligent deaths within the last times.
Dining table step 3 gift suggestions brand new mean values and you may fundamental deviations of the scales ‘decimal demands’, ‘burnout’, therefore the financial support balances ‘meaning of work’ and you will ‘office commitment’. The bills achieved an appropriate quantity of interior consistency.
Bivariate analyses
There’s a robust self-confident correlation involving the ‘decimal demands’ and ‘burnout’ bills (roentgen = 0.498, p ? 0.01), and you can a tiny negative relationship ranging from ‘burnout’ and you can ‘concept of work’ (r = -0.222, p ? 0.01) and you will ‘office commitment’ (roentgen = -0.240, p ? 0.01). About your first and you will job-relevant attributes of one’s test revealed inside Table dos, ‘burnout’ is notably connected with ‘the quantity of palliative care’ (? 20% at your workplace time: letter = 199, Meters = , SD = ; > 20% at the job big date: letter = 115, Yards = , SD = , t(step three12) = -step three.261, p = 0.001). Furthermore, you will find a critical perception regarding the ‘number of patient deaths over the past month’ (F (2, 393) = 5.197, p = 0.006). The latest suggest of burnout rating try down to possess nurses revealing no diligent deaths over the past day than for nurses revealing four or maybe more fatalities (letter = 62, Meters = , SD = rather than n = 116, Meters = , SD = ). There’s zero association ranging from ‘quantitative demands’ and you may an enthusiastic ‘most qualification in palliative care’ (zero degree: n = 328, Yards = , SD = ; more degree: n = 103, M = , SD = , p = 0.559).
The new connection anywhere between ‘burnout’ as well as the analyzed (categorical) capital parameters is showed from inside the Desk 4. Nurses generally had a lower value into ‘burnout’ level when reporting some info. Precisely the tips ‘family’, ‘religiosity/spirituality’, ‘appreciation away from patients’, ‘detection owing to clients/relatives’ and you may an ‘most certification into the palliative care’ weren’t on the ‘burnout’.
Moderator analyses
In total, 16 moderation analyses were conducted. Table 5 presents the results of the moderation analyses where a significant moderation was found. For ‘workplace commitment’, there was a positive and significant association between ‘quantitative demands’ and ‘burnout’ (b = 0.47, SE = 0.051, p < 0.001). An increase of one value on the scale ‘quantitative demands' increased the scale ‘burnout' by 0.47. ‘Workplace commitment' was negatively related to ‘burnout', meaning that a higher degree of ‘workplace commitment' was related to a lower level of ‘burnout' (b = -0.11, SE = 0.048, p = 0.030). A model with the interaction term of ‘quantitative demands' and the resource ‘workplace commitment' accounted for significantly more variance in ‘burnout' than a model without interaction term (?R 2 = 0.021, p = 0.004). The impact of ‘quantitative demands' on ‘burnout' was dependent on ‘workplace commitment' (b = -0.01, SE = 0.002 p = 0.004). The variables explained 31.9% of the variance in ‘burnout'.
