Erridge and colleagues (2016) summarized the fresh medical programs out-of pure starting transluminal endoscopic procedures (NOTES) when you look at the bariatric surgery

Erridge and colleagues (2016) summarized the fresh medical programs out-of pure starting transluminal endoscopic procedures (NOTES) when you look at the bariatric surgery

Such detectives carried out a look at studies, up to from techniques and you will results of bariatric Notes measures. A maximum of 9 courses had been included in the final analysis, having another six documents outlining endolumenal actions provided for analysis. All the Notes studies accompanied a crossbreed procedure. Hybrid Cards arm gastrectomy (hNSG) is demonstrated when you look at the cuatro humans and you will 2 porcine knowledge. Inside the individuals, 6 victims (23.1 %) was in fact transformed into old-fashioned laparoscopic measures, and you can step 1 article-operative risk (step 3.8 %) is actually claimed. Imply excess weight losings is 46.6 % (listing of thirty-five.dos in order to 58.9). The newest authors determined that transvaginal-assisted sleeve gastrectomy searched feasible and you can safe whenever did by the rightly coached professionals. However, they reported that developments should be built to beat current technology limitations.

An enthusiastic UpToDate review on the “Natural opening transluminal endoscopic procedures (NOTES)” (Pasricha and you will Rivas, 2018) claims you to “Natural opening transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) try a surfacing industry in this gastrointestinal businesses and you can interventional gastroenterology in the which the doctor accesses the peritoneal hole via a hollow viscus and functions symptomatic and healing procedures … There clearly was far more that needs to be found out about it techniques, for instance the risk of peritoneal toxic contamination. Thus far, the new offered body of medical experience will not have indicated deleterious effects linked to toxic contamination and you may subsequent infection. At present, Cards still is highly recommended generally fresh and really should be achieved merely from inside the research function”.

Candy Cane Disorder (Roux Disorder)

Sweets cane disorder (CCS), which is also called Roux disorder or Chocolate cane Roux disorder, was a rare complication when you look at the customers just after Roux-en-Y gastric avoid functions. It happens if there’s a too much length of roux limb proximal so you can gastrojejunostomy, undertaking the option to have restaurants particles so you’re able to resorts and stay within the brand new blind redundant limb.

All of the got pre-medical functions-around pick CCS

Aryaie and colleagues (2017) noted that CCS has been implicated as a cause of abdominal pain, nausea, and emesis after RYGB; however, it remains poorly described. These investigators reported that CCS is real and can be treated effectively with revisional bariatric surgery. All patients who underwent resection of the “Candy cane” between were included in this study. Demographic data; pre-, peri-, and post-operative symptoms; data regarding hospitalization; and post-operative weight loss were examined via retrospective chart review. Data were analyzed using Student’s t test and ?2 analysis where appropriate. A total of 19 patients had resection of the “Candy cane” (94 % women, mean age of 50 ± 11 years), within 3 to 11 years after initial RYGB. Primary presenting symptoms were epigastric abdominal pain (68 %) and nausea/vomiting (32 %), especially with fibrous foods and meats. On upper gastro-intestinal (GI) study and endoscopy, the afferent blind limb was the most direct outlet from the gastrojejunostomy. Only patients with these pre-operative findings were deemed to have CCS; 18 (94 singleparentmeet %) cases were completed laparoscopically. Length of the “Candy cane” ranged from 3 to 22 cm; median length of stay was 1 day. After resection, 18 (94 %) patients had complete resolution of their symptoms (p < 0.001). Mean BMI decreased from 33.9 ± 6.1 kg/m2 pre-operatively to 31.7 ± 5.6 kg/m2 at 6 months (17.4 % EWL) and 30.5 ± 6.9 kg/m2 at 1 year (25.7 % EWL). The average length of latest follow-up was 20.7 months. The authors concluded that CCS is a real phenomenon that could be managed safely with excellent outcomes with resection of the blind afferent limb. A thorough diagnostic work-up is critical for proper identification of CCS; and surgeons should minimize the size of the blind afferent loop left at the time of initial RYGB.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *